Low battery
Battery level is below 20%. Connect charger soon.
People have a habit of citing less than optimal answers as precedents for their own answers if theyre not flagged. Except non is not an english word, it is a prefix of latin origin. Atypical is by far the most common of the three, as confirmed in a google ngram search, so that would be my suggestion. · non- is defined as a prefix meaning not, freely used as an english formative, usually with a simple negative force as implying mere negation or absence of something (rather than the opposite or reverse of it, as often expressed by un-). · both unfeasible and infeasible are words according to spell-check, and they appear have similar dictionary definitions. British rules differ, and the non- construction is frequently found in the literature. Nontypical, and with a hyphen non-typical, are hardly used at all. Untypical is apparently most often used in the phrase not untypical. · at the linguistics conference, there were no / not / non- native speakers of esperanto. Which is why american style manuals will always ask you to merge it with the subsequent word, without a hyphen. · the comments on the video suggested that both black and non-black people found it funny, but im unsure how widely acceptable this type of humor is. Another google ngram search supports this. Is one more acceptable. · explore related questions is-it-a-word subcontinental-english non-standard see similar questions with these tags. For example, non-control freak · the caveat should be enough to discourage other non-referenced answers; · given current usage, i very much doubt blessed is strictly considered religious (whatever that might mean). But what is the difference between the two words? I cannot find an entry for either in any popular online dictionary. A similar word is thankful, which is rarely ever ascribed to any deity in particular in popular usage. In real life, are there any exceptions that might allow non-black people to use the n-word? 24 does non- prefixed to a two word phrase permit another hyphen before the second word? Theyre all grammatically valid, but they all mean different things - and pragmatically / idiomatically, only the no version is likely to be used. If i want to refer to an entity which is defined as the negation of another entity by attaching non- it seems strange to attach the non- only to the first word when the second one is really the word naming the entity.
